Home » » Letter to IMC on villagers opposition to Adani’s proposed ship breaking facility in Mundra, Gujarat

Letter to IMC on villagers opposition to Adani’s proposed ship breaking facility in Mundra, Gujarat

Written By Unknown on Friday, August 02, 2013 | 1:12 AM

ToxicsWatch Alliance (TWA)


Inter Ministerial Committee (IMC) on Ship breaking
Union Ministry of Steel
Government of India
New Delhi

Date: August 2, 2013

Subject- Villagers oppose Adani’s proposed ship breaking facility in Mundra, Gujarat
This is to inform you that villagers have expressed their strong opposition at the public hearing on July 30, 2013 for a new ship-breaking facility near Mundra West Port in Gujarat’s Kutch district proposed by Gautam Adani led Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Limited (APSEZL).
I submit that villagers are opposing it because the proposed project will result in destruction of mangroves, leveling of sand dunes and adverse impacts on agriculture. 
When villagers started questioning, Shri P. N. Roy Chowdhury, an IAS officer who serves as the Joint President of Strategic Planning APSEZL was fielded to respond to the concerns of the villagers failed to provide convincing replies to them.
 I wish to inform you that Shri Naran Gadhavi, of Kheti Vikas Seva Trust who was present at the hearing stated that villagers are totally opposed to the proposed ship breaking facility. Mundra West Port is located near Vandh Village in Mundra Taluk of Kutch district in Gujarat about 16 km south-west of Mundra. The project is within the port limits notified as Special Economic Zone (SEZ). The proposed ship recycling facility measures 40.7432 hectare adjacent to the existing Mundra West Port. Adani’s own EIA report admits that, “at present most of the land is still submerged and only a minor portion is located in the inter-tidal zone.”
Its report reveals that “the land for the project is being created by dumping dredge spoils, generated due to expansion of Mundra West Port, up to 7.0 m above the chart datum.” It is admitted that in Indian waters, “the ships are scrapped directly on the beaches or the vast inter-tidal mudflats exposed daily by about 10m tidal gauge. The beaching method of the Indian sub-continent relies heavily on low labour cost, since it involves very little mechanisation.” This beaching method which Adani’s company proposes in Mundra is fatally flawed.
 It is clear that in a tactical and clever manner the company has taken environmental clearance for its various projects in the proposed region in installments by outwitting the regulatory agencies. This ploy is apparent when one reads in its claim in the Draft EIA report that “APSEZL had received Environmental and CRZ Clearance for Water Front Development Clearance from the Ministry of Environment and Forests…” This truncated approach in grant of environmental clearances “has led to massive ecological changes with adverse impacts” the committee observed.  The proposed ship-breaking facility is bound to aggravate the situation if cumulative and induced impact is taken into consideration.
Environmental groups like ToxicsWatch Alliance (TWA) and Paryavaran Mitra have termed APSEZL as a habitual violator of environmental laws that has adversely impacted the environment and the livelihood of the fishing communities.  
It may be noted that Shri Debi Goenka of Conservation Action Trust who was also present at the public hearing reported on July 30, 2013, “Incidentally, the fisher folk were not allowed to speak. The dy Collector also decided that only locals would be allowed to speak only in Gujarati and others could give their comments in writing.  He was forced to continue with the hearing after he had ended it at 2 pm when we objected. He was also unable to explain why only locals could speak at a public hearing and why only Gujarati was being allowed.  Adani and their consultants could not even answer a simple question put to them about the different forms of asbestos. By the way, Roy Choudhary is a retired IAS officer who still pretends that he is part of Gujarat Government even though he is now officially working for Adanis, and is now officially being paid by them.”  Environmental groups have denounced the proposal for ship breaking facility in Mundra as a threat to both the terrestrial and marine environment as well as to public health.

In view of such concerns, I seek your intervention to ensure that the proposed project is not allowed in the Mundra’s fragile coastal ecosystem. 

Yours faithfully
Gopal Krishna
ToxicsWatch Alliance (TWA)
Mb: 09818089660

Share this article :

Post a Comment

Copyright © 2013. ToxicsWatch, Journal of Earth, Science, Economy and Justice - All Rights Reserved
Proudly powered by Blogger