Featured Articles

Latest Post

Kya Congress aur BJP Mukesh Ambani ki dukaan hai?

Written By Krishna on Wednesday, October 31, 2012 | 6:07 AM

In the Nira Radia tapes, Ranjan Bhattacharya  (Atal Behari Vajpayee’s son in law) is heard telling Nira that Mukesh Ambani told him –“Congress to ab apni dukaan hai.” Facts below show that both Congress and BJP are in his pocket.

Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) has the contract to extract oil from KG Basin. Under an agreement of 2009 with the government, they are supposed to sell gas at $ 4.2 per mmBTU upto 31st March 2014. Midway now, RIL is demanding that the price be increased to $ 14.2 per mmBTU. Jaipal Reddy resisted that and he was thrown out.

In a bid to expose industrialist-politician nexus, Arvind Kejriwal-led India Against Corruption (IAC) on October 31, 2012 accused the Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Industries and the two biggest national parties of being hand in glove and indulging into corrupt prices, saying both "the Congress and the BJP are in Ambani's pockets".

Text of IAC's press release:
Kya Congress Mukesh Ambani ki dukaan hai? (All documents mentioned in this note are available on our site www.indiaagainstcorruption.org)

In 2006, Mani Shankar Iyer was removed and Murli Deora brought in to increase RIL capex from $2.39 billion to $8.8 billion and to increase gas price from $2.34 per mmBTU to $ 4.2 per mmBTU.

In 2012, Jaipal Reddy has been removed and Moily brought in to increase gas prices from $ 4.2 per mmBTU to $ 14.2 mmBTU and to condone RIL’s blackmailing of reducing gas production.

Huge benefits given to RIL in last one decade despite flagrant violations of various agreements by RIL. Benefits to RIL causing serious price rise in the country.

Both BJP and Congress involved. BJP signed a sweet deal with RIL in 2000. Congress faithfully implemented it.

If RIL demand of increasing the gas price to $ 14.2 is accepted, it would lead to shut down of several gas based power plants and increase in power and fertilizer prices. It would result in Rs 43,000 crores of additional benefits to RIL.

In the Nira Radia tapes, Ranjan Bhattacharya (Vajpayee’s son in law) is heard telling Nira that Mukesh Ambani told him –“Congress to ab apni dukaan hai.” Facts below show that both Congress and BJP are in his pocket.

Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) has the contract to extract oil from KG Basin. Under an agreement of 2009 with the government, they are supposed to sell gas at $ 4.2 per mmBTU upto 31st March 2014. Midway now, RIL is demanding that the price be increased to $ 14.2 per mmBTU. Jaipal Reddy resisted that and he was thrown out.

Jaipal Reddy had prepared a note for EGOM, in which he mentioned that acceptance of RIL’s demand would mean an additional profit of Rs 43,000 crores ($8.5 billion) to RIL(in 2 years) at current levels of low production. Most of this gas is used in fertilizer and power production. Increasing gas price would mean an additional financial burden of Rs 53,000Crores ($ 10.5 billion) on central and state government (copy of relevant page of EGOM note is attached as annexure 1). This would in turn mean higher electricity and fertilizer prices in the country or a higher subsidy burden.

In order to pressurize the government, RIL substantially reduced its production of natural gas. Total consumption of natural gas in the country is 156 mmscmd. According to agreement, RIL was supposed to produce 80mmscmd (more than 50% of the total demand) from 2009. However, they are producing just 27 mmscmd, almost a third of their commitment. Production has been artificially kept low to blackmail the government. They are not just hoarding the gas, but also forcing various consumers to buy gas from abroad. Gas from abroad costs around $ 13 per mmBTU.

RIL’s stand is simple – “hum to gas $14.2 par hi denge, lena hai to lo, nahin to jao.” Who does this gas belong to? According to Supreme Court of India and the Indian Constitution, this gas belongs to the people of India. Complete surrender of UPA before RIL indicates UPA’s inability to run governance in accordance with the Constitution.

Drastic reduction in production has forced many gas based power plants in the country to shut down or run at much lower capacity. According to media reports, almost 9000 MW of gas based power plants are lying idle. Today, power from gas based power plant costs around Rs 3 per KWH. If gas price is increased from $ 4.2 to $ 14.2 as demanded by Reliance, power rates would go upto Rs 7 per KWH. That’s too expensive. At that cost, most of these plants would have to permanently shut down.

This is not the first time that a union minister has been eased out at Mukesh Ambani’s insistence. In 2006, when RIL had to get its capex increased from $ 2.39 billion dollars to $ 8.8 billion dollars, Mani Shankar Iyer was removed and a more Reliance friendly MurliDeora was brought in.

Brief history:

RIL got this contract during NDA regime in the year 2000. The contract was meant to favor RIL right from the beginning. In any business, increase in costs means decrease in profits. However, the NDA government , signed a contract dictated by RIL wherein an increase in cost by one rupee meant additional profits of RIL by almost Rs 2.2. Isn’t it strange? A parameter called Investment Multiple has been defined in the contract as under:

Investment Multiple (IM) = Total Revenue / Total Investment

According to the contract, till IM is below 1.5, RIL takes away more than 80% of profits and government gets less than 20 per cent of profits. It is only when IM becomes more than 2.5 that government gets 85 per cent. This means, RIL has a huge incentive to keep IM below 1.5 by increasing the expenditure artificially. Thus if Reliance were to increase expenditure from 1 Billion to 2 Billion on a revenue of 5 billion, their own net income would go up from 1.6 Billion to 3.5 Billion. This is what the CAG has stated in para 8.1 of its performance Audit of Hydrocarbon PSCs. (extract from executive summary of CAG as annexure 2)

In 2004, RIL submitted an Initial Development Plan (IDP) saying they would produce 40 mmscmd for an investment of $ 2.39 billion. All this happened when Ram Naik was the petroleum minister in Vajpayee regime.

Within 2 years, RIL submitted another plan saying they would produce 80 mmscmd for an increased investment of $ 8.8 billion. Doesn’t that sound strange? To double production, you increase your investment by four times? Having put the initial infrastructure in place, it should have cost lesser to create additional production capacity.

Mani Shankar Iyer, who was the then Petroleum minister, would not have allowed this. So, Mani was shunted out of petroleum ministry and Murli Deora, famous to be Reliance man, was brought in January 2006. Despite strong protests by some MPs like Tapan Sen, Deora approved $ 8.8 billion expenditure. By allowing $ 8.8 billion expenditure, in effect, Deora allowed a future revenue of over Rs 1 lakh crores ($ 20 billion dollars) for RIL.

CAG has remarked that there is strong evidence that RIL is gold plating its capital expenditure. Expenditure has been artificially increased (for reasons mentioned above). For instance, RIL is required to place orders for its plant, machinery and other requirements through international competitive bids. CAG alleges that bids were arbitrarily rejected to favor some parties. Just one company namely Aker group got many contracts (see annexure 3, which is an extract from CAG report). Is this group related to RIL? Is RIL siphoning off money through this method?

RIL’s pressure tactics:

RIL signed a contract with NTPC in 2004 to supply gas for its power plants at $ 2.34 per mmBTU for 17 years. It signed a similar contract with RNRL to supply gas at $ 2.34 per mmBTU. However, RIL went back on its word. Under RIL’s pressure, EGOM headed by Sh Pranab Mukherjee, revised gas price in September 2007 to $ 4.2 per mmBTU. NTPC and RNRL were forced to accept gas from RIL at revised price. By doing this, Pranab Mukherjee headed EGOM gave an undue benefit of Rs8000 crores to RIL.

What is RIL’s actual cost of production?

Cost of production is much less than $ 2.34 per mmBTU. (Copy of extracts from an SC order Annexure 4).RIL had actually signed long term agreements with NTPC and RNRL for supplying gas at that rate for 17 years. This means that at $2.34 per mmBTU also, RIL was making adequate profits. India is getting gas at $ 0.9 per mmBTU from Oman. Gas rates in Canada are at $ 1.74 per mmBTU. This means that at $ 2.34 per mmBTU also, RIL was making huge profits.

RIL sold out nation’s resources:

Ownership rights of this gas belong to the people of India. RIL is just a contractor hired by GOI to extract gas. Strangely, RIL sold 30% stake in 21 of 29 oil blocks to British Petroleum in July 2011 at $ 7.2 billion. Government gave approval to RIL to do that. How can they do that? It is almost like – I hire a driver to drive my car and that driver sells off my car after a few days.

Performance of RIL so far has been much worse than perhaps the worst performing government department.

1. 4 times cost escalation within 2 years from $ 2.39 billion in 2004 to $ 8.8 billion in 2006.

2. Increase in gas price from $ 2.34 per mmBTU in 2004 to $ 4.2 per mmBTU in 2007 to the present demand of $ 14.2 per mmBTU.

3. Capacity created for producing 80 mmscmd after incurring such a huge cost ends up producing just 27 mmscmd after 12 years.

4. 31 oil wells should have been in production till now. Out of them, just 13 are functional.

Has any government department fared as badly? If this had happened in any government department, it would have been ripped apart by all government agencies and media.

RIL scam akin to coal scam:

This scam is on similar lines as Coal block allocation scam. Coal blocks were given away saying that coal production was less in the country and private sector participation would increase coal production. Rather than produce coal, the private parties hoarded coal blocks to sell them at appropriate time in future.

In this case also, oil blocks were given away to RIL on the excuse that oil and gas production in the country was less and private sector participation would bring “efficiency”. Rather than the production going up, RIL is hoarding the gas.

Role of PM:

RIL’s request for increase in gas prices was turned down by Ministry of Petroleum under Jaipal Reddy and EGOM several times in the last 2 years. EGOM had fixed $ 4.2 per mmBTU price for RIL upto 31.3.2014. When Jaipal Reddy did not budge, RIL approached the PM. PM was very sympathetic to RIL. PM requested Ministry of Petroleum to seek AG’s opinion on whether gas prices could be increased midway as demanded by Reliance. It is strange why did the PM not show similar concern when NTPC was forced to accept higher gas price from RIL? Why is the PM not pulling up Reliance for not producing 80 mmscmd gas as per their commitment? Why did the PM not seek legal opinion when country’s interests were at stake? Why is PM showing so much interest when RIL interests are at stake?

Notice to RIL by Jaipal Reddy:

When RIL failed to meet its production targets, Jaipal Reddy decided to disallow their capital expenditure. In the first instance, a notice for disallowance of $ 1 billion expenditure was sent to RIL (Annex 5). This would mean a loss of $2.2 (11,000 Crores) billion to RIL, if we consider IM ratio. Next year, this disallowance could be $ 1.5 billion, which would mean a loss of $ 3.3 billion (16,500 Crores) for RIL.

That is the reason why Mukesh Ambani got restless. And that is the reason why Jaipal Reddy was transferred out.

Real reasons for price rise in the country:

This episode explains the real reasons for price rise in the country. The government seems to be succumbing to illegitimate demands of some powerful corporates in the country (like RIL in this case). Benefits provided to RIL in this case contributed to price rise in power and fertilizer sectors. Similarly, on one hand, government says that they do not have Rs 35,000 crores to provide LPG subsidy to the people, on the other hand, the government bends backwards to provide benefits to these corporate.

Questions:

1. Who is running the government? It appears that telecom companies select their own nominee as Telecom minister and RIL selects its own person as Petroleum minister.

2. So, is this government being run by powerful corporates?

3. Is Dr Manmohan Singh succumbing to corporates under some compulsions or out of ignorance? What are the compulsions, if any?

We demand:

RIL blackmailing should be immediately stopped. Their KG Basin contract should be cancelled. Government should immediately put in place adequate systems to get full production from KG Basin at cheapest prices for the country.

Annexure 1 - Note prepared for EGOM
Annexure 2-3 - Executive summary of CAG report
Annexure 3 - CAG findings related to KG block
Annexure 4 - SC Order
Annexure 5 - Notice to RIL
 
 

Open letter to Gujarat Chief Minister on ongoing deaths of north Indian migrant workers on Alang beach

Written By Krishna on Tuesday, October 30, 2012 | 7:27 AM



Open letter to Gujarat Chief Minister, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi on ongoing deaths of north Indian migrant workers on Alang beach

Dear Shri Modiji,

This is to draw your attention towards yet another death on October 29, 2012 of a north Indian migrant worker from Uttar Pradesh in Bhavnagar’s Sterling Hospital. He succumbed to Gujarat’s Alang beach fire of October 6, 2012 in which several workers were burnt to death while dismantling a British end-of-life ship. I am attaching the picture of a dead body of a migrant worker who died in this fire.   

I submit that during your tenure from 2001 to 2012, officially there have been at least 173 deaths without anyone being made accountable or liable. In your recent interview to India Today magazine (November 5, 2012) you underlined that “600 million Gujaratis are my family”, the migrant workers, the non-Gujaratis who are routinely dying on Alang beach do not appear to be your concern at all.

I submit that the ongoing deaths of migrant workers from Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand and Odisha on Alang beach, Bhavnagar, Gujarat came to light once again when officially six (now seven) workers were burnt to death on October 6, 2012. Sources have informed that the death toll is higher. These occupational deaths routinely happen. There has nothing been done to arrest these preventable deaths.

I submit that in the year 2011, 27 workers died in the shipbreaking activities at Alang beach.  These migrant casual workers live and work in a slave like condition.

You say “there are 52 islands along the coast of Gujarat. I want to make them tourist attractions of international standard.” During you tenure why is it that you forgot about the fate of Alang coast which is the worst coastal beach in the world.  Gujarat government too the right step by shutting down the Sachana plots in November 2011 citing massive pollution as a reason, Sachana shipbreaking plots in Jamnagar district , Gujarat where some private agencies have been carrying out ship-breaking work. The closure order read:  “The ship-breaking is termed illegal because this breaking activity is going on in the water of Marine National Park…” stated an order dated 22-11-2011 from the Office of Chief Forest Conservator. The order said: “Because of ship-breaking, harmful objects like arsenic, mercury, asbestos, oil, etc could harm marine life in the long time. This leads to complex problems for protecting and conserving the Marine National Park and Marine sanctuary.”I submit that these observations are quite relevant for the ship-breaking operations on Alang beach, Bhavnagar as well but your government ignored the similarity between the two.

I wish to draw your attention towards UN Special Rapporteur's report based on his visit t o Alang beach in January 2010. I submit that UN Special Rapporteur's assessment reads:”…in India ships are dismantled on beaches, a method commonly referred to as “beaching”. This method of ship dismantling fails to comply with generally accepted norms and standards on environmental protection. Although very little work has been carried out to assess its environmental impact, the dismantling of ships on sandy beaches without any containment other than the hull of the ship itself appears to have caused high levels of contamination of soil, air, and marine and freshwater resources in many South Asian countries, and to have adversely affected the livelihood of local communities surrounding the shipbreaking facilities, which often rely on agriculture and fishing for their subsistence" at page 9 of the report.

I submit that UN Special Rapporteur's recommends "an independent study be carried out to assess the actual and potential adverse effects caused by the discharge of hazardous substances and materials into the natural environment. Such a study should also assess the steps that need to be taken for the gradual phasing out of “beaching” in favour of more environmentally friendly methods of shipbreaking" at page 21 of the report.

I submit that it has been almost 3 years but nothing has been done to make Alang coastal beach a tourist attraction of international standard.  Some 6, 000 end-of-life ships were permitted in the   past   30 years ignoring Navel Intelligence reports underlining threat to Alang’s coastal environment.

I submit that your government has failed to ensure that the guilty officials and ship breakers are made accountable. In the context of the recent deaths if you were sensitive you would have ensured that no deaths happen in future by re-opening the old cases of occupational deaths on the Alang beach to set matters right. Those plots which are more accident prone than mines must be closed with immediate effect. The migrant workers deserve both medical and legal remedy besides just compensation.

I submit that the recent inspection by Shri E K Bharat Bhushan led Supreme Court constituted Inter-Ministerial Committee (IMC) on Shipbreaking team took note of non-existent environmental and occupational health infrastructure for the umpteenth time since 2004. It is sad that recommendations of IMC from 2004 to 2012 onwards have not been implemented by your government. 

I submit that after each accident and death of workers, inquiry is ordered but their report remains classified and no action has been taken. All the migrant workers who became victims in the fire of October 6, 2012 in Plot no. 82 on Alang beach belonged to Uttar Pradesh. The deceased were identified as Hiralal Chaudhary (28), Ajay Chaudhary (22), Ram Milan (35), Sanjay Yadav (25), Subhash Yadav (28) and Dharmendra Chaudhary. It is not clear whether IMC team inquired about the compensation given to these workers. The half burnt person Ram Singh Sahai remains in the hospital died yesterday. Only a high level probe can bring out the names of the others who are dead but whose whereabouts has not been disclosed so far.  The workers who officially died included three from Basti and three from Gorakhpur. The one from Basti include Hiralal, s/o Ram Kishun, village/post Bharapur, Ajay Chaudhary, s/o Satyendra Chaudhary, village-Chakda, Post- Kalwani. Your government should reveal how they have dealt with the death of these workers and how their families have been compensated and what steps have been taken to prevent loss of human lives due to inhuman lust of ship breakers and global shipping companies for profit.  

I submit that as per Hon’ble Supreme Court order District Collector, Bhavnagar has to ensure that dismantling takes place as per a dismantling in keeping with its directions. Sources have revealed that in disregard to Court's order so far the District Collector has chosen not to be associated with the dismantling process. Such non-compliance is unpardonable but appears routine.     

I submit that at present the migrant workers in Alang who face discrimination for being Hindi speaking and are not covered under Employees' State Insurance Corporation. Workers' living and working condition remains bad.

I submit that the illegal shipment of hazardous waste "from industrialised countries is being shipped to less developed countries under the listed intention of recycling and reclamation," is a serious problem which has been noted even by INTERPOL. According to Green Customs Initiative, national and international crime syndicates earn 20-30 billion US dollars annually from hazardous wastes dumping, smuggling proscribed hazardous materials. Clearly, environmental crime and escaping of decontamination cost by global shipping companies in collaboration with international recycling industry is a significant and increasingly lucrative business but Gujarat government has turned a blind eye to it.

It appears that the world’s most controversial beach has been colonized by the global shipping companies for good. British East India Company entered India through Surat ungovernable shipping companies which are bigger than several governments has entered through Alang beach. In 17th century, Gujarati businessmen facilitated western imperialism of India by welcoming a company. At present they are aiding and abetting colonialism by dumping hazardous waste at the behest of shipping companies of imperial powers.      

The UN report states, "Health facilities in Alang/Sosiya do not possess sufficient human, technical and financial resources to provide any treatment other than first aid for minor injuries. The nearest hospital equipped to deal with life-threatening conditions is in Bhavnagar, more than 50 kilometres away. The Red Cross hospital in Alang, which the Special Rapporteur visited, can count on only four medical doctors and nine beds to provide health care not only to some 30,000 workers in the yards, but also to the neighbouring villages of Alang (which has a population of about 18,000 people) and Sosiya (4,000 people)" on page 14. The regime of blind profit at any cost is ruling the roost on this ecologically fragile beach illustrates how all the efforts by the Supreme Court and UN agencies have been undermined with impunity. 

I submit that environmental and occupational health crisis due to hazardous industrial activities on Alang beach, the huge dangers from the shipbreaking industry to local communities and the environment remained unaddressed during your tenure so far.

I am enclosing a list of workers who have been killed on Alang beach. You are addressing election rallies both in north India and in Gujarat, as a fellow Indian and as a non-Gujarati from north India; I want to know how your government has given justice to them.

Gopal Krishna
Convener
ToxicsWatch Alliance (TWA)
New Delhi



Year wise deaths of migrant workers at Alang beach

Year
Number of Deaths at Alang
1991
10
1992
12
1993
16
1994
28
1995
29
1996
28
1997
51
1998
28
1999
30
2000
29
2001
16
2002
12
2003
24
2004
5
2005
16
2006
5
2007
12
2008
3
2009
15
2010
24
2011
27
2012
14
Total
434

Source: Office of Senior Inspector of Factories, Alang, Dist. Bhavnagar and Sandesh news paper, Bhavnagar edition report of October 7, 2012, complied by ToxicsWatch Alliance   

Note: The number of deaths mentioned could be less than reported by other sources. A possible explanation for this discrepancy may be that seriously injured workers may not have been treated in the local hospital and may have died there. The reason could be deliberate suppression of information to escape paying compensation. Since 1998 till 2012 there were 389 workers who are injured officially. In the last 15 years, there have been 316 fire incidents in which 49 workers died as per Sandesh news paper, Bhavnagar edition report of October 10, 2012.   

 

Anti-Kudankulam stir: Vaiko, Thirumavalavan held

Written By Krishna on Monday, October 29, 2012 | 10:01 AM

Members of different political parties being arrest after participating in a protest against Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant in Chennai on Monday. Photo: K. Pichumani
  • Members of different political parties being arrest after participating in a protest against Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant in Chennai on Monday. Photo: K. Pichumani,
    The Hindu
Hundreds of anti-nuclear activists and leaders of different political outfits were detained in Chennai on Monday when they attempted to lay siege to the State Assembly demanding scrapping of the Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant.
MDMK leader Vaiko, Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi leader and MP Thol. Thirumavalavan, pro-Tamil leader P. Nedumaran along with hundreds of activists and fishermen were detained by a heavy posse of police when they tried to take out a march towards the Secretariat.MDMDK general secretary Vaiko being arrested after participating the anti-Kudankulam protest in Chennai on Monday. Photo: K. Pichumani
Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi leader Thol. Thirumavalavan being arrested after taking part in the anti-Kudankulam protest in Chennai on Monday. Photo: K. Pichumani
Strongly opposing the Indo-Russian project, Mr. Vaiko alleged that India had secretly agreed to provide power to Sri Lanka from the Kudankulam Project.
Mr. Thirumavalavan said not only Kudankulam, Kalpakkam and all nuclear power stations in the country should be closed. He said Chief Minister Jayalalithaa should make all efforts to close the project.
To coincide with the Assembly-siege, anti-nuclear activists formed a human chain in the sea off Idinthakarai, the focal point of the year long stir in support of the demand.
S.P. Udhayakumar, convenor of People’s Movement Against Nuclear Energy spearheading the protest, told reporters at Idinthakarai that on October 31, their supporters would submit memoranda to various embassies in New Delhi and Chennai highlighting the “need” to stop nuclear power plants.
Fishermen from 13 coastal districts in Tamil Nadu and nine in Kerala and Puducherry would join the protest on that day.
Mr. Udhayakumar claimed 25,000 people have joined the protest in Chennai and it was a big victory.
Commissioning of the first unit of the KNPP was originally scheduled for December last year but has been delayed due to the protests. PTI

Privatisation of water, unconstitutional: Justice Sachar

Privatisation of water
It’s unconstitutional and a failed venture
by Justice Rajindar Sachar (retd)
India is governed by a written Constitution and any policy decision, programme by the Central or state government must be within the constitutional parameter of the Constitution.
The State under our Constitution is mandated to protect the human rights. Any government policy, which seeks to shift this responsibility from the state to the private sector, would be, without anything more, unconstitutional and hence impermissible.
The United Nations, since its inception, has accepted that water is a ‘human right’. In 2010, the General Assembly adopted a resolution declaring the Right to Water and Sanitation a human right.
The Supreme Court has held that Article 21 of the Constitution includes the right of a citizen to water and sanitation. In that light per se any proposal to privatise water would be unconstitutional. Is it not, therefore, a matter of concern that the Indian state should be working towards privatising water supply, which really amounts to abdicating its duty to enforce human rights? Ever since the National Water Policy 2002 was formulated, there have been attempts in India to privatise and commoditise water.
The water problem and its peculiarities in supply, distributions are all misdirected against the supply to the poor. I am, however, highlighting the position in Delhi, which is enforcing privatisation of water supply policy meant to cater to the affluent at the cost of the poor — 70% of the households in Delhi with a monthly per capital of expenditure of less than Rs. 1,500, the poverty line accepted by the Planning Commission.
The whole exercise by the Delhi government is to give exploitive profits to the private party. Thus, according to public information, it costs the Delhi Jal Board Rs. 15 per litre to obtain water – but it has agreed to supply water to the private company at about Rs. 1.50 per litre. There is then further benefit to the company by permitting an automatic annual increase of 10% in water billing by the private company. In the new tariff apart from water charges a sewage charge of 60% is also imposed, notwithstanding that the replacement, if any, of pipes will be by the Delhi Jal Board. But most astounding is the introduction of service charges apart from the billing for water consumption. This service charge is a shame-faced attempt to give extra money because the consumer is paying separately for consumption anyway. On a consumption charge of, say Rs. 170, per month there will be added a service charge of Rs. 320 per month There is no explanation of what and how service charge can be imposed apart from consumption charges.
Another unabashed provision to favour the private company is to divide colonies into District Metered Areas (DMAs) on the pretext that water would be provided to the DMAs by private companies at all times/days (24x7).  But there is an ill-conceived catch so as to benefit private companies, as the performance of the water company will be assessed not on the basis of whether water is received 24x7 water in every house or not, but on the basis of whether the water company provided 24x7 water at the input of each DMA or not. The water company can also divert water from one area to another within the same DMA. This would neither affect the performance of the company nor be treated as a violation of any of the licence conditions. The water company will try to maximise revenues by diverting water to big hotels, industries etc, which would purchase water in bulk at higher revenues.
The Delhi Jal Board should be looking into more worthwhile functions. It supplies 850 million gallons of drinking water per day more than its installed capacity. Its treatment facility provides for only 5.4 million gallons a day – the rest of the untreated water is one of the major sources of pollution of the Yamuna.
The Delhi government is inspired by the World Bank-supported 24x7 water supply pilot projects as, for example, in Hubli- Dharwad. But the report of the Working Group on Urban Water Supply and Sanitation for the 12th  Plan has pointed out that the initial project period was 2004-08 and was then extended to 2011. Reaching 10 per cent of the twin cities’ existing connections took seven years.
Water privatisation and other similar schemes to benefit big corporations are the brainchild of the World Bank. Though initially the countries succumbed to this pressure, the anger of the masses at the deprivation of life-giving water to them and instead to benefit big corporation has unleashed a world movement of “re-municipalisation” of water supply in several cities, most notably Paris (which re-commenced with public water management in January 2010) due to cost-saving potential. The “re-municipalisation” got off to a promising start – water tariffs were reduced by 8 per cent in 2011. Two countries are making water privatisation illegal: Uruguay, and the Netherlands. In both cases, the new laws prohibit not only the sale of water systems but also the delegation of the operation of water supply to private companies.
As recent as October 2012 many civil society organisations have protested to the President of the European Commission to stop imposing the policy of privatisation of water.
The newly formed municipal corporations in Delhi have also demanded that water supply be handed over to them. It is for the Delhi Government to ignore the global trend towards “re-municipalisation” and to invite  private  companies to play a larger role in so essential a public utility as the supply and distribution of water. The so-called PPPs are a barely concealed cover for the public-private sharing of risk and profit such that there would be predominantly public risk and predominantly private profit.
A pervious attempt to privatize water was made in 2005; At that time August 2005 when World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz visited Delhi, he was confronted with vociferous protests against ‘the Bank’s policies and condition alities of water privatization through the back door’ – a clear message of ‘Hands Off Water.’ Why is it being revived now – is the forthcoming  elections in Delhi and the urgent need for getting big donations the real secret. Any continuance of water privatization policy will remain suspect.

 The writer is a former Chief Justice of the High Court of Delhi
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2012/20121029/edit.htm#4 

5 things science, tech & earth sciences minister must do

October 29, 2012 18:25 IST

The new Science, Technology and Earth Sciences Minister Sudini Jaipal Reddy can contribute to undo India's pathetic scientific reputation in terms of invention and innovation, says Gopal Krishna

Outstanding Parliamentarian Sudini Jaipal Reddy, the new minister of science, technology and earth sciences deserves salute for his role as a minister of petroleum and natural gas from where he has been shifted in a stark controversial move. Some external forces who believe in getting the law changed if the law is not favourable and getting the minister and officers changed if they are honest, have prevailed once again in the way it did earlier in the case Mani Shankar Aiyar.
First, reminding our romnesiac prime minister of his inaugural speech at the 99th Indian Science Congress in January 2012, the new minister should seek enhanced budgetary allocation for his ministry. Although the prime minister emphasised the need for a major increase in investment in research and development, the allocation of funds for the science and technology sector in the Union Budget for 2012-13 was highly unsatisfactory. 
Admittedly, the current spending on R&D in the country was "too low and stagnant" at about one per cent of GDP. The current allocations for the science ministries and departments reveal the prime minister's insincerity.

Second, the imminent launch of the Rs 450 crore Mars Orbiter Mission to study martian atmosphere from the spaceport in Sriharikota, Andhra Pradesh, making India the sixth country to launch after United States, Russia, Europe, Japan and China in November next year merits his attention. The first thing he should is to set up a high-level scientific team to study why the mars mission by China and Japan was abandoned midway. The spacecraft is expected to take nearly 300 days to reach the martian orbit. The spacecraft will be placed in an orbit of 500x80,000 km around mars and has a tentative scientific objective for studying the climate, geology, origin, evolution and sustainability of life on the planet. The Union Cabinet approved the mission at a meeting on August 4, which was announced by the prime minister in his 66th Independence Day address.

Third, at a time when exploitation of unfathomable global commons like the deep sea bed, Antarctica and space is imminent and the UN even has a committee to discuss resource exploitation on the moon his role in turning the current reductionist approach of the ministry into a holistic approach towards the life-bearing planet will be path breaking. He must undo the current well entrenched inequality by ensuring that most scientific findings become available in vernacular languages in real time instead of letting it trickle down after decades. The access to most fruits of modern science and technology is getting cornered by 1 per cent private interests at the cost of commons. Industries displace more earth per annum than is lost through natural erosion.

The annual runoff from aquifer mining nearly matches the sea level rise from the "melt" of polar glaciers; and there is 3 to 6 times more water dammed than in natural rivers. Its adverse impact will be unprecedented. Knowledge of the carrying capacity of earth's space occupied by India is extremely limited this must be ascertained before replumbing of planet unfolds and before it is too late.

Fourth, while the international nature of scientific inquiry is admitted what appears forgotten is that science exists in a local/national social setting. If that setting is molded decisively the conceptual growth of science will determine the depth of its influence. The ministry must overhaul its institutional structure to reach every local setting, every village of the country.  

Fifth, technological transformation at least since 1992 through information technologies, biotechnologies and engineering has unfolded amidst lack of trusted and transparent mechanisms for technology evaluation at global, regional and national levels. India is not an exception to such unhealthy trend. It may be recollected that Agenda 21's Chapter 34 had called for regional capacity-building for technology assessment but in 1993, the UN all but eliminated its Center for Science and Technology for Development, moved the remnants from New York to UNCTAD in Geneva, and, simultaneously, eradicated its Centre on Transnational Corporations, thus terminating the minimal global capacity that had existed to monitor and advice on new technologies and on private sector technology transfer.

There is a surveillance regime emerging for people but not technologies. The speed and cost of mapping the human genome has dropped from 13 years and $1.3 billion to 14 days and $5,000 en route to 15 minutes and a few hundred dollars soon after 2012. Governments have spent more than $50 billion on nanotech research & development; the cost of carbon nanotubes has dropped by a factor of 20 since 2001. It is frightening that there are thousands of consumer products that rely on it but there is no agreed nanotech definition or regulation.
As to synthetic biology, undergraduates with $400 gene synthesisers can download templates to build DNA while scientists can create self-replicating artificial microbes and six letter DNA. The world is moving towards a convergence era. Governments and scientific institutions are predicting the unification of "Bits, Atoms, Neurons and Genes" as the next Industrial Revolution transforming trade, economies and industrial production unfortunately without evaluation.

Failure of new technologies and innovations without evaluation since the 1992 Earth Summit proved socially, ecologically and financially costly in Europe and globally. The greatest technological transformation in history has occurred over the last 20 years while governments systematically downsized or eliminated their capacity to comprehend science and monitor technologies. The minister must create an institutional architecture that can make technology companies and their unverified and experimental technologies subservient to legislative will and institutional regulation.     

Ministers come and go at the whims and fancies of ungovernable business enterprises in all the parliamentary democracies but the positive impact the minister can leave behind on country's science, technology and India's share of earth can contribute to undo India's pathetic scientific reputation in terms of invention and innovation. 
Gopal Krishna 

Mukesh Ambani tops India rich list, Hindujas up


For the fifth year in a row, Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) chairman Mukesh Ambani retained the top spot as India’s wealthiest man with a net worth of $21 billion, despite his fortune falling for the third year in a row, according to global business magazine Forbes’ annual ranking of 100 wealthiest Indians released on October 25, 2012.

Ambani’s net worth stood at $22.6 billion last year. Abhay Vakil and Ashwin Choksi, who are from the family that controls Asian Paints have entered the billionaire ranks for the first time separately.

Habil Khorakiwala of pharma giant Wockhardt has re-entered the billionaire ranks
while the Hinduja brothers, who are Britons, enter the list on the back of their Indian assets.

Ranjan Pai of the Manipal education group is just short of the billion league with an estimated wealth of $975 million.

While LakshmiMittal held on to the number 2 spot with $16 billion, down $3.2 billion, liquor baron Vijay Mallya lost his billionaire tag as his aviation business dragged down his networth to below the $1-billion mark. Mallya has been ranked 73rd with a fortune of $800 million, a sharp plunge from 49th place last year when he was worth $1.1 billion.

Azim Premji of Wipro bagged the number 3 position with a net worth of $12.2 billion, lower by $800 million from a year ago.

The biggest gainer was Dilip Shanghvi of Sun Pharma, who broke into the top 5 with a $2.5 billion jump in networth at $9.2 billion. There are now 61 billionaires in all, 4 more than last year.

Among them are the Hinduja brothers who debut with an estimated $8 billion
fortune. While 3 of the siblings are not Indian citizens, their expanding business ties
to India made them candidates this year.

They are also the richest of the 11 newcomers to the list of 100 richest Indians. The youngest newcomer is 40-10/29/12 Mukesh Ambani tops India rich list, year-old Pai(ranked 63) who is credited with turning his Manipal Group into a global brand in education.

The billionaires’ collective net worth is up 3.7% at $250 billion compared to $241 billion a year ago. But, according to Forbes, the gains were uneven as seven lost more than a billion and six gained at least that much.

Hindustan Times
http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/Print/949826.aspx
 
Copyright © 2013. ToxicsWatch, Journal of Earth, Science, Economy and Justice - All Rights Reserved
Proudly powered by Blogger