Home » » India must support a UN treaty to regulate corporations

India must support a UN treaty to regulate corporations

Written By Unknown on Monday, May 05, 2014 | 3:41 AM

Note: It is indeed a sad commentary on the state of affairs in India that Government of India has not expressed its support for the Ecuadorian declaration regarding "Transnational Corporations and Human Rights" before the UN Human Rights Council session in September 2013. This action taken of the Ecuadorian government has been ratified in Geneva at the 2nd Forum on Business and Human Rights on 3 and 4 December 2013. The declaration has received wide support from UN member-countries, such as the African Group, the Arabic Group, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Kyrgyzstan, Cuba, Nicaragua, Bolivia, Venezuela and Peru. Although India used to be at the forefront of initiatives like Code of Conduct for TNCs, its silence with regard to September 2013 declaration is inconsistent with India's past stance on the issue and is contrary to the interest of present and future generation of Indians. 

The statement on behalf of a Group of Countries at the 24th Session of the Human Rights Council General Debate on “Transnational Corporations and Human Rights” is given below.

In view of its significance, one of the first few tasks the new government which which is formed after May 16, 2014 is to publicly endorse the declaration ahead of the 26th Human Rights Council Session scheduled to be held in Geneva from 10 to 26 of June 2014 to discuss a proposed legally binding international instrument on business and human rights to be included within the UN system.

Voluntary and self regulatory frameworks have failed consistently to regulate corporations. There is an urgent need for a legally binding treaty is adopted to regulate admittedly undemocratic organisations like corporations which have become bigger and more powerful than democratic governments.  

While the effort to create a corporation regulation treaty must take robust legal shape, the question which merits attention is can national governments in UN or independent of UN regulate corporations given the fact that corporations own the government? Will this effort too fail like the previous such efforts? Is India's reluctance a result of fear of failure or is it in the vice like grip of corporations who do not wish to be regulated?

Gopal Krishna
ToxicsWatch Alliance (TWA)

Statement on behalf of a Group of Countries at the 24th Session of the Human Rights Council General Debate-Item 3
“Transnational Corporations and Human Rights”
Geneva, September 2013

Mr. President,
We deliver this statement on behalf of the African Group, the Arab Group, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Kyrgyzstan, Cuba, Nicaragua, Bolivia, Venezuela, Peru and Ecuador.
States who subscribe to this statement welcome the steps taken by the Human Rights Council in order to address the issue of the role and responsabilities of transnational corporations and human rights, in particular the work of former United Nations SRSG for Business and Human Rights, John Ruggie, who elaborated the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights endorsed by the UN Human Rights Council in its
resolution 17/4), of July 2011, and the creation of the Working Group on Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with a mandate “to promote the effective and comprehensive dissemination of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights”.

The increasing cases of human rights violations and abuses by some Transnational Corporations reminds us of the necessity of moving forward towards a legally binding framework to regulate the work of transnational corporations and to provide appropriate protection, justice and remedy to the victims of human rights abuses
directly resulting from or related to the activities of some transnational corporations and other businesses enterprises.

The endorsement by the UN Human Rights Council in June 2011 of the “Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations Protect, Respect, and Remedy Framework” was a first step, but without a legally binding instrument, it will remain only as such: a “first step” without further consequence. A legally binding instrument would provide the framework for enhanced State action to protect rights and prevent the occurrence of violations
We are mindful that soft law instruments such as the Guiding Principles and the creation of the Working Group with limited powers to undertake monitoring of corporate compliance with the Principles are only a partial answer to the pressing issues relating to human rights abuses by transnational corporations. These principles and mechanisms fell short of addressing properly the problem of lack of accountability regarding Transnational Corporations worldwide and the absence of adequate legal remedies for victims.

An international legally binding instrument, concluded within the UN system, would clarify the obligations of transnational corporations in the field of human rights, as well as of corporations in relation to States,
and provide for the establishment of effective remedies for victims in cases where domestic jurisdiction is clearly unable to prosecute effectively those companies.

Finally, States that subscribe this statement will like to renew their commitment to work towards the elaboration of a legally binding instrument on the basis of a careful and serious assessment of options
available in the framework of the Human Rights Council. The achievement of this goal will benefit people everywhere, and contribute to enhance the level of human rights enjoyment and of protection of the environment.

Thank you Mr. President.
Share this article :

Post a Comment

Copyright © 2013. ToxicsWatch, Journal of Earth, Science, Economy and Justice - All Rights Reserved
Proudly powered by Blogger