Home » » Justice continues to be delayed for Okhla residents suffering from Jindal’s Chinese Incinerator

Justice continues to be delayed for Okhla residents suffering from Jindal’s Chinese Incinerator

Written By Krishna on Friday, January 25, 2013 | 2:50 AM


Press Release

Justice continues to be delayed for Okhla residents suffering from Jindal’s Chinese Incinerator

Delhi High Court shifts Okhla Waste Power Plant Case to National Green Tribunal

High Court listed the case 27 times between July 2009 and to January 2013 but residents got no relief in municipal waste incinerator case  
  
New Delhi: January 23, 2013 was a sad day for Okhla residents hearing the matter after listing the matter for 27 times since July 8, 2009, Delhi High Court shifted the matter to Justice Swatanter Kumar headed National Green Tribunal in view of the Supreme Court order of August 9, 2012. The order said that the matter be shifted to the Tribunal with Court records within one week to be listed within one week.    
 
Residents in the colonies of Okhla have been waiting for High Court to come to their rescue from a heavily polluting hazardous incinerator technology based power plant since 2009. Environmental groups and waste recycling workers have also been protesting against it. This power plant is being operated by Delhi's Timarpur-Okhla Waste Management Co Pvt Ltd (TOWMCL) of M/s Jindal Urban Infrastructure Limited (JUIL), a company of M/s Jindal Saw Group Limited is a controversial carbon trade project that has violated every rule in the rule book.

With this the High Court has shifted the Writ Petition (Civil) NO. 9901/2009 which was filed by the resident’s welfare association (RWA) of Sukhdev Vihar, Okhla against the municipal waste incineration power plant is being operated. The plant faces bitter opposition from residents, waste pickers and environmental groups. Residential colonies of Sukhdev Vihar, New friends Colony, Maharani Bagh, Haji Colony and Ghaffar Manzil have been agitating against this plant that has been set lawlessly. Adjacent to the plant are major institutions such as the Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (IGIB), Central Road Research Institute (CRRI),  Apollo Hospital, Fortis Escorts Heart Institute and the Holy Family Hospital, besides several schools such as the Dev Samaj Public School.

There have been incessant demonstrations and protest rallies against this project. There is an ongoing campaign against it. The plant that has been built despite protest is 150 m from the residential areas. The area has a bird sanctuary, a university and three hospitals within a radius of 10 kilometres. All will be adversely affected by toxic fumes of the plant. The idea of waste to energy plants which is based on a tried, tested and failed incineration technology in Okhla. The company claims that the land on which the plant is operating “was transferred on lease by Government of Delhi from this 200 acre piece of land that had been earmarked for waste treatment facilities in Delhi's master plan back in 1920's.” The Municipal Solid Waste is
being delivered by NDMC and MCD at the Okhla Power Plant site. Although it is claimed that “only non Hazardous Municipal Solid Waste will be treated at the facility”, the fact is Delhi’s mixed municipal waste has characteristics of   hazardous waste. MCD, Delhi government and central government has shown unpardonable callousness towards hazardous emissions from municipal incinerators that cause serious environmental and health problems both to people living near them and thousands of kilometres from the source. The details the listing of matter reveals how justice has been delayed to the residents of Okhla colonies like Sukhdev Vihar who are suffering without any legal remedy in sight. Case Status: [W.P.(C) 9901/2009]
List of Dates of Hearing in Delhi High Court  
 S. No.
 Case No
 Date of Order
 1.
W.P.(C) 9901/2009
 15/01/2013
 2.
W.P.(C) 9901/2009
 07/01/2013
 3.
W.P.(C) 9901/2009
 24/01/2012
 4.
W.P.(C) 9901/2009
 12/12/2011
 5.
W.P.(C) 9901/2009
 17/11/2011
 6.
W.P.(C) 9901/2009
 03/11/2011
 7.
W.P.(C) 9901/2009
 20/10/2011
 8.
W.P.(C) 9901/2009
 29/08/2011
 9.
W.P.(C) 9901/2009
 18/07/2011
 10.
W.P.(C) 9901/2009
 23/05/2011
 11.
W.P.(C) 9901/2009
 06/04/2011
 12.
W.P.(C) 9901/2009
 12/01/2011
 13.
W.P.(C) 9901/2009
 15/09/2010
 14.
W.P.(C) 9901/2009
 22/07/2010
 15.
W.P.(C) No. 9901/2009
 15/04/2010
 16.
W.P.(C) 9901/2009
 10/02/2010
 17.
W.P.(C) 9901/2009
 03/02/2010
 18.
Review Petition No. 448/2009 and CM No. 14214/2009 in W.P(C) 9901/2009
 15/01/2010
 19.
WP(C) No. 9901/2009
 18/12/2009
 20.
CM No.14215/2009 in WP(C) 9901/2009
 11/12/2009
 21.
RP 448/2009 in WP(C) 9901/2009
 27/11/2009
 22.
Crl. M.C. No. 2906/2009 and Crl.M.A. Nos.9844/2009, 9901/2009
 04/09/2009
 23.
W.P.(C) 9901/2009 and CM No. 8154/2009
 12/08/2009
 24.
CM No. 9901/2009 in FAO(OS) 425/2008
 06/08/2009
 25.
C.M. No. 9901/2009 in FAO(OS) 425/2008
 24/07/2009
 26.
C.M. No. 9901/2009 in FAO(OS) 425/2008
 22/07/2009
 27.
W.P.(C) 9901/2009 and CM No. 8154/2009
 08/07/2009


In a related development, on December 27, 2013, Subhash Chopra, a Member of Delhi Legislative Assembly wrote separately to Chief Minister of Delhi and Lt. Governor of Delhi, Tejender Khanna demanding inquiry into the toxic fly ash from the Jindal's large plant.

Earlier, opposition party leaders of the BJP had also expressed apprehension over the location of such a plant in a densely populated areas of South Delhi.  “This plant would release various types of harmful gases which will certainly pose serious helath threat to the lives of surrounding residents,” said Vijay Kumar Malhotra, BJP M.P. in a letter dated June 27, 2008 to the Lt. Governor of Delhi, Tejender Khanna.

It has come to light that contrary to the report of the Central Pollution Control Board, Union Minister for Environment & Forests Smt. Jayanthi Natarajan stated in Rajya Sabha informed the Parliament that “as per the Central pollution Control Board, the technology being used by the Waste-to-Energy plant at Okhla is as specified in the Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000.” This is far from the truth.

The Environment Minister had informed the Parliament that “complaints were received against the incineration of municipal waste and its likely harmful effects on the air quality and health of people in the Sukhdev Vihar/Okhla area due to the emissions from Waste-to – Energy plant at Okhla.” She admitted that “on four occasions out of ten, levels of Particulate matter (PM) exceeded the standard of 150 mg/Nm3”. She did not reveal anything about the emissions of Dioxins/furans which remains one of the core concerns. The company claims that “The facility has been installed with a sophisticated Continuous Emission Monitoring System (CEMS) supplied by Yokogawa Japan, one of the foremost technology suppliers in this field. The system is designed to measure SO2, NOx, CO2, O2 & HCL at chimney & ID Fan outlet. SO, NOx, CO2 is measured by Infra red principle, O2 is by zirconia cell, HCL is measured by using Gas filter co-relation IR based principle.” While this is being done by the company, what is the role of regulators like Delhi Pollution Control Committee and Central Pollution Control Board.

A statement on company website reveals that Timarpur Okhla Waste Power Plant “generates 3 MW energy using the municipal solid waste in Delhi”. What it does not reveal is its human and environmental cost. Her statement issued by Press Information Bureau.  

It is claimed on the company’s website that the waste based power plant is registered as a Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) project with United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) “for earning carbon credits.”

Representatives of GTZ (German Technical Cooperation) led by Dr. Juergen Porst, Senior Advisor have stressed the need for a Disaster Management Plan in the very first meeting of the CPCB'sTechnical Expert Committee, which is annexed to the CPCB'sreport. But this does not find mention in the recommendations of the report. This finds reference in the minutes of the meeting annexed with the report. It underlines the possibility of disaster from the Timarpur-Okhla Waste to Energy Incinerator Plant, which is situated in a residential area.

It is noteworthy that a hazardous plant in Bhopal's residential area that led to world worst industrial disaster in 1984 also did not have any disaster management plan.

The report apprehended that the information that is submitted to the experts committee of CPCB might be used in the on-going case in the Delhi High Court. It makes a shocking revelation that although High Court has been hearing the case since 2009, the project proponent did not inform the court about gross deviations from the project design plan envisaged in the EIA report. As per the minutes of the second meeting of the technical experts committee, non-cooperative approach of the senior officials of Timarpur-Okhla Waste to Energy Incinerator Plant was condemned on August 11, 2011. Representatives of GTZ underlined that there was lack of transparency with regard to environmental and health impact on the neighborhood residents. It was also noted that the fugitive emissions and the expected emission of Dioxins and Furans has not been quantified. The characteristic of ash and required standards was not mentioned. Prof. T R Sreekrishnan, Department of Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology stated that disposal option for incineration instead of bio-methanation proposed for green waste is in violation of what was mentioned in the EIA report.

In the report, Dr A B Akolkar, Director, CPCB emphasized that as per Municipal Solid Waste (Management & Handling) Rules biodegradable wastes to be treated using biological method rather than deriving RDF or by incineration as is being done by Jindal Ecopolis. This clearly demonstrates that the Timarpur-Okhla Waste to Energy Incinerator Plant violates the Municipal Solid Waste (Management & Handling) Rules framed under Environment Protection Act, 1986.

In the Writ Petition (Civil) No. 9901 of 2009 in Delhi High Court, legal officials like Mr A S Chandiok Additional Solicitor General and Standing Counsel for the Delhi Government and for the Delhi Pollution Control Committee, Najmi Waziri has been misleading and misrepresenting facts about waste to energy plants in Andhra Pradesh by saying that Refuse Derived Fuel incineration technology was already in use at Hyderabad and Vijayawada. The fact is that there is no plant in Hyderabad. The plant that became functional as per legal officials now stands defunct is in Shadnagar, Mahboobnagar district of Andhra Pradesh.

On 18th July, 2011, Delhi High Court asked CPCB and the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) to conduct a joint inquiry about India’s first waste-to-energy plant and file a report on the allegations that it posed health risks to citizens. “A joint report be submitted by the DPCC and the CPCB after an inquiry of the site of the energy plant about the alleged risks posed to citizens,” ordered a bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Delhi High Court. This has not been done so far. A bizarre situation has emerged because the arguments for Refuse Derived Fuel incineration technology that was advanced by the law officers is no more relevant because the plant is using an experimental Chinese technology which was never ever mentioned at the time of submitting the project proposal.

The report of the Union Environment & Forests Ministry constituted Technical Experts Evaluation Committee of Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) on the Timarpur-Okhla Waste to Energy Incinerator Plant revealed to the Experts Committee in September 2011 that it is using untested and unapproved Chinese incinerator technology in complete violation all laws and environmental clearance of 2007 including its own project design document and environment impact assessment report. Chinese technology provider is from Hangzhou New Century Company Ltd of Hangzhou Boiler Group.

The August 2012 Supreme Court order on National Green Tribunal was authored by Justice Swatanter Kumar on behalf of the three judge bench comprising of Chief Justice of India S H Kapadia, Justice A.K. Patnaik and himself in Writ Petition (C ) No.50 of 1998.  The relevant part of the judgment reads:   
“38. Keeping in view the provisions and scheme of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 (for short the ‘NGT Act’) particularly Sections 14, 29, 30 and 38(5), it can safely be concluded that the environmental issues and matters covered under the NGT Act, Schedule 1 should be instituted and litigated before the National Green Tribunal (for short ‘NGT’). Such approach may be necessary to avoid likelihood of conflict of orders between the High Courts and the NGT. Thus, in unambiguous terms, we direct that all the matters instituted after coming into force of the NGT Act and which are covered under the provisions of the NGT Act and/or in Schedule I to the NGT Act shall stand transferred and can be instituted only before the NGT. This will help in rendering expeditious and specialized justice in the field of environment to all concerned.

39. We find it imperative to place on record a caution for consideration of the courts of competent jurisdiction that the cases filed and pending prior to coming into force of the NGT Act, involving questions of environmental laws and/or relating to any of the seven statutes specified in Schedule I of the NGT Act, should also be dealt with by the specialized tribunal, that is the NGT, created under the provisions of the NGT Act. The Courts may be well advised to direct transfer of such cases to the NGT in its discretion, as it will be in the fitness of administration of justice.”

It is noteworthy that a petition has been filed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court Bar Association challenging the constitutional validity of the National Green Tribunal Act, which excluded the jurisdiction of a High Court to entertain writ petitions on environment and forest related matters. The matter is before the three judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India, Altamas Kabir.  This case raises question that has an impact across the country because certain provisions require judicial review since they take away appellate jurisdiction of the High Courts completely. The Supreme Court Bench has issued notice in the matter.  The petition has prayed for striking down the provisions of Section 14 read with Section 22 of the NGT Act to the extent that they divested the High Courts of their constitutional powers under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India.

Unmindful of grave public health and environmental concerns both Congress party led Delhi government and BJP led MCD are promoting such toxic power plants which emit chemicals like Dioxins which were used in US-Vietnam war. Okhla residents waited for the High Court to come to their rescue but so far they have consistently been disappointed. The same Court came to their rescue of the biomedical waste incinerator due to adverse effect on their health in its judgment on January 15, 2013. This judgment was/is quite relevant. It had sealed the fate of the Jindal’s Chinese incinerator which was in question in the Writ Petition (Civil) NO. 9901/2009 on January 23, 2013 but the Court suddenly remembered National Green Tribunal order of the Supreme Court bringing despair to the affected residents.    

For Details: Gopal Krishna, Convener, ToxicsWatch Alliance (TWA), Mb: 9818089660, Email: krishna1715@gmail.com, Web:toxicswatch.blogspot.com
Vimal Monga, President, Sukhdev Vihar RWA, 9810499277, E-mail: vimalmonga@yahoo.com
Asha Arora, Okhla Anti-incinerator Committee, 9711408421
Okhla Anti-incinerator Committee, http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/ghoslaokhla


Share this article :

+ comments + 1 comments

Post a Comment

 
Copyright © 2013. ToxicsWatch, Journal of Earth, Science, Economy and Justice - All Rights Reserved
Proudly powered by Blogger