A petition was filed in the Supreme Court on October 14 demanding a stay on all nuclear plant projects in India.
The petition was filed by very prominent citizens -- Dr EAS Sarma, former power secretary, Government of India, TSR Subramanian, former Cabinet Secretary, Government of India and N Gopalaswami, Former Chief Election Commissioner, Government of India and several others.
The petition seeks a stay on all proposed nuclear plants will the safety analysis is carried out.
This petition will have a bearing on the Jaitapur nuke-plant in Maharashtra and also the Koodankulam plant in Tamil Nadu.
14 October 2011
Former bureaucrats, scientists move SC against nuclear plants
Members of civil society, including former bureaucrats, scientists, a former Navy Chief and NGOs, today approached the Supreme Court seeking its direction to stay construction of all proposed nuclear power plants.
They have filed a joint PIL pleading that the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act, 2010, be declared as unconstitutional and appoint an expert independent body to conduct a thorough safety reassessment of all existing and proposed nuclear facilities in the country.
"Issue an appropriate writ canceling clearances given to proposed nuclear power plants and staying all proposed nuclear power plants till requisite safety assessment studies, thorough comparative cost-benefit analysis and meaningful public hearings are carried out by or under the supervision of an independent expert body," the petition said.
They submitted the apex court should rule that in the case of a nuclear accident, all nuclear operators and suppliers, would be jointly and severally and absolutely liable for civil damages and their financial liability would be unlimited.
They have also pleaded the court to quash all the agreements signed between the government and private companies, for supply of nuclear reactors and equipment, based on private negotiations, without any competitive process and safety evaluation.
"The government’s plans for expansion of nuclear power programme and construction of newer and huge nuclear power plants without undertaking a thorough safety and comparative cost-benefit analysis, clearly made under the influence of foreign countries and multi-billion dollar nuclear industry, shows arbitrary decision-making, based on extraneous considerations and non-application of mind," the petition said.
"The Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act, 2010, by capping the financial liability of operators and by making suppliers not liable violates the polluter-pays principle and the absolute liability principle which have become recognized as part of the law of the land and puts to grave and imminent risk the right to safety, health, clean environment and life of the people," the petition said.
Oct 14, PTI
What Australia type fire may tell us about the possibility of nuclear disasters - *Pinar Demircan | *Australian fires can even be considered as a warning in many respects for the rest of the world for the factors which triggered the fi...